Intranasal Ketamine Matches IV Morphine for Acute Pain

A chart from Downing H, Asbell DK, McCarthy E, Brumitt J. Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous opioids for acute pain in the emergency department: A scoping review. Am J Emerg Med. 2026 Jun 2;108:26-34 showing pain scores over time using IN Ketamine vs IV Morphine

Researched and written by Mike Shertz, MD/18D, not AI

🕖 Reading Time, 4 minutes

Based on 8 RCTs IN ketamine is equal to IV morphine for pain control in ED patients.

  • IN administration is faster and less technically challenging than IV administration.
  • IV morphine kicks in faster but has higher rates of vomiting and hypotension.

 A scoping review looked at 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intranasal ketamine (IN) to intravenous (IV) morphine in Emergency Department patients for pain control largely secondary to kidney stones or musculoskeletal trauma. The studies comprised 40 to 184 patients from EDs in Iran, Israel, and Thailand.  

Ketamine dosing ranged from 0.3 mg / kg to 1.5 mg / kg IN, with 6 of 8 studies using 1 mg / kg IN. Morphine doses of 0.1 mg / kg IV were used across all studies, except one that used fentanyl.  

For quantity of pain control, across multiple studies, IN ketamine was equal to IV morphine. 

A chart comparing IN Ketamine vs IV Opiod from an article by Downing H, Asbell DK, McCarthy E, Brumitt J. Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous opioids for acute pain in the emergency department: A scoping review. Am J Emerg Med. 2026 Jun 2;108:26-34.
Downing H, Asbell DK, McCarthy E, Brumitt J. Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous opioids for acute pain in the emergency department: A scoping review. Am J Emerg Med. 2026 Jun 2;108:26-34.

Though one study comparing time to onset of pain relief found no statistical difference between the two drugs (14.3 minutes of IN ketamine versus 8.9 minutes IV morphine), multiple other studies showed morphine had a faster onset for pain relief. Ultimately, only 2 of 8 RCTS showed ketamine and morphine were equal for pain reduction across all time hacks. However, overall pain reduction was equal between the two medications, even if IV morphine was faster.

Adverse events (AEs) with both drugs were mild and resolved without intervention. “Dizziness and nausea” were the most common AEs. Only one patient across all studies received medications for nausea after morphine administration. That is unusual as American ED nurses will medicate just about any patient with nausea after opioids, as nobody likes to clean up vomit. 

Though the statistics weren’t significantly different, 6.25% of IV morphine patients actually vomited, whereas with IN ketamine it was only 3.5%.

One study looked at the patient’s perspective and found they were equally satisfied with either IN ketamine or IV morphine. 

One note is the patients in these studies were not hypotensive or in shock. Very few of the studies looked at hypotension associated with pain medications. In one study 8 of 20 IV morphine patients became hypotensive. Overall, no ketamine patients became hypotensive, whereas 3.7% of all morphine patients did. That’s why you don’t use morphine in sick trauma patients. 

What does all this mean to you: IV morphine was faster to provide pain reduction, but ultimately, IN ketamine was just as good for pain control, it just took a bit longer to kick in. Related: You might also want to read: IO pain control with lidocaine

IN medication administration is an excellent way to provide medications rapidly, particularly in patients who might be challenging IV access. IN avoids fist pass hepatic metabolism, but most drugs have a reduced bio availability IN. Ketamine specifically is 40 to 50% bioavailable IN. That means only half of what you squirt in their nose actually gets into the blood stream and does the work. One caveat for IN, since the maximum volume for IN is <1 ml per nostril, drug concentrations matter.  

Reference

Downing H, Asbell DK, McCarthy E, Brumitt J. Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous opioids for acute pain in the emergency department: A scoping review. Am J Emerg Med. 2026 Jun 2;108:26-34.

Picture of Mike Shertz MD/18D

Mike Shertz MD/18D

Dr. Mike Shertz is the Owner and Lead Instructor at Crisis Medicine. Dr. Shertz is a dual-boarded Emergency Medicine and EMS physician, having spent over 30 years gaining the experience and insight to create and provide his comprehensive, science-informed, training to better prepare everyday citizens, law enforcement, EMS, and the military to manage casualties and wounded in high-risk environments. Drawing on his prior experience as an Army Special Forces medic (18D), two decades as an armed, embedded tactical medic on a regional SWAT team, and as a Fire Service and EMS medical director. Using a combination of current and historical events, Dr. Shertz’s lectures include relevant, illustrative photos, as well as hands-on demonstrations to demystify the how, why, when to use each emergency medical procedure you need to become a Force Multiplier for Good.