• Training
    • TCCC and TECC Concepts
    • Training for Fire & EMS
    • Training for Law Enforcement
    • Training for EDC
    • Training for Private Citizens
    • Training For Faith Communities
    • Training For Teachers
  • Courses
    • Preview Course
    • Course Overview By Skills
    • ONLINE TCCC & TECC Courses
    • Student Reviews
    • In-Person Trainings
  • Company
    • About Crisis Medicine
    • Agency Pricing
    • Contact
    • CM in the Media
    • Disclosures – None
    • Lessons Learned in Blood
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Learn
    • New
    • Quick Tips
    • MARCH
      • (S) Security & Awareness
      • (M) Massive Hemorrhage
      • (A) Airway
      • (R) Respiration
      • (C) Circulation
      • (H) Hypothermia Prevention
    • Equipment
    • Improvised
    • Casualty Movement
    • More
    • Tactical CBRN
    • Planning Your IFAK
  • Shop
    • Cart

      0

Contact our office:

(503) 765-7615
logistics@crisis-medicine.com
Login
Crisis Medicine
  • Training
    • TCCC and TECC Concepts
    • Training for Fire & EMS
    • Training for Law Enforcement
    • Training for EDC
    • Training for Private Citizens
    • Training For Faith Communities
    • Training For Teachers
  • Courses
    • Preview Course
    • Course Overview By Skills
    • ONLINE TCCC & TECC Courses
    • Student Reviews
    • In-Person Trainings
  • Company
    • About Crisis Medicine
    • Agency Pricing
    • Contact
    • CM in the Media
    • Disclosures – None
    • Lessons Learned in Blood
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Learn
    • New
    • Quick Tips
    • MARCH
      • (S) Security & Awareness
      • (M) Massive Hemorrhage
      • (A) Airway
      • (R) Respiration
      • (C) Circulation
      • (H) Hypothermia Prevention
    • Equipment
    • Improvised
    • Casualty Movement
    • More
    • Tactical CBRN
    • Planning Your IFAK
  • Shop
    • Cart

      0

(M) Massive Hemorrhage

Heavy flow is not massive hemorrhage: Tampons don’t belong in IFAKs

  • Posted by Mike Shertz
  • Categories (M) Massive Hemorrhage, Equipment
  • Date July 17, 2019
  • Comments 1 comment
Regular and super-absorbant tampons compared to two 4x4s, their rough equivalent; a roll of training combat gauze; and a roll of Kerlix Gauze.

Recently we posted a video outlining the challenges of using hemostatic granules as compared to gauze. In response, we were surprised by how many people advocated for tactical tampons to control massive hemorrhage in a gunshot wound. “Depending on the bullet hole size, tampon and pads are your best bets…” Or, “A tampon would have done the same thing.” Not true.

Tampons will not control massive or life-threatening bleeding.

It’s not their job and it’s beyond their capability. While many have written on the fallacy of using tampons for hemorrhage control and wound packing in massively bleeding wounds,1, 2 there are still those on the internet who continue to endorse this misguided technique.

I can find no peer-reviewed medical literature describing or testing the use of a tampon on traumatic bleeding wounds.

Although anecdotal stories of tampons being used in military settings for hemorrhage control may exist, using a tampon as a bandage or “blood sponge” is very different than trying to stop massive hemorrhage with one. Even if the often-referenced Snopes.com cite about a Marine being saved by a tampon placed in his wound by his buddy is true, it doesn’t prove the veracity of the technique.3

A side by side comparison with one super absorbent tampon, compared to a roll of standard Kerlix gauze, which is a superior choice to stop massive hemorrhage than a tampon
A side by side comparison with one super-absorbent tampon, compared to a roll of standard Kerlix gauze.

The military has a long history of one generation handing down unofficial lessons learned to the next generation. It seems possible some military medic somewhere was told, “it was the way to go,” but it doesn’t mean it works. When I was in the Special Forces Medical Sergeant’s course in 1987, we trained extensively on live tissue. I remember specifically being told the instructors had tried tampons for hemorrhage control, but they were never effective.

Named arteries (generally the larger ones such as the axilla, brachial, radial, etc) can bleed several hundred milliliters of blood per minute when perforated. (200 milliliters is about 40 teaspoons for those metric-adverse, or 4 shot glasses if that’s your preferred unit of measure). Prehospital hemorrhage control options for this kind of bleeding are tourniquets, if the bleeding source is amenable to circumferential pressure, for instance, a limb, or wound-packing if the bleeding is in “junctional areas” like the neck, axilla, and groin.

To control life-threatening hemorrhage anywhere in the body, the goal is to stop the bleeding.

That is generally accomplished by encouraging the blood to clot and essentially “seal the hole” in the bleeding blood vessel. With wound packing, this is done by tightly packing gauze directly at the point of bleeding. When enough gauze is packed into the wound, the pressure exerted by the packing will actually be more than the bleeding blood vessel’s bleeding pressure. This slows or stops the bleeding and allows for clotting to occur. In a ballistic gel wound model, measuring a volume of 53 ml, a Kerlix–like gauze exerted 156 mmHg pressure in the wound when packed by well-trained combat medics.4

A pile of 36 tampons compared to the one roll of Kerlix Gauze, which is a better choice to control massive hemorrhage than a tampon
A pile of 36 tampons compared to the one roll of Kerlix Gauze

Still inclined to keep tampons in your IFAK or first aid kit?

The average tampon contains approximately 2 – 2×4 inch pieces of gauze. Kerlix gauze is between 3.6-4.1 yards long. From a cost perspective, tampons also make no sense to stock in an IFAK. If a tampon costs $0.24 each (at bulk Amazon pricing) and is approximately 4” of gauze, it would take $8.64 worth of tampons to equal the length of packing material in one $1.99 roll of Kerlix (at non-bulk pricing). If someone is bleeding to death from a junctional wound, shoving a 4×4 in the wound is not going to accomplish the same thing as 156mmHg pressure from 12 feet of gauze.4

Hemostatic gauzes help with clotting by providing pro-coagulant materials or mucoadhesives, thus making it easier for blood to clot. The goal of the packed gauze isn’t to absorb blood, but to encourage clotting. That is exactly how direct pressure works. Provide so much pressure on the bleeding site that blood can’t come out, which allows the clot to form. With no pressure, the blood keeps washing the body’s efforts to form a clot out with the blood. If you need to improvise to pack a wound, there are much better and readily available choices than a tampon, including strips of fabric.

Tampons are not designed to stop bleeding, but rather simply absorb it.

“The function of the internal tampon is to absorb menstrual blood inside the vagina after it has left the uterus, preventing it from leaking out, and thus providing suitable protection with total discretion.”5

How much blood does a woman actually even lose during menses? “Most women will lose less than 80 ml (16 teaspoons) of blood during their period, with the average being around 6 to 8 teaspoons. Heavy menstrual bleeding is defined as losing more than 80 ml with each period.” Remember a shot glass is 50 ml. Though inconvenient, this is not a lot of bleeding.6

How much blood is the most absorbent tampon made to soak up? The most absorbent tampons manufactured are “Ultra-absorbency Tampons” which absorb up to 17 ml of menstrual blood.7

For a little history on the tampon, there are different accounts of its first use. Women have been fashioning solutions to absorb menstrual flow since the Egyptian era, including intravaginally. The first commercial applicator tampon was created by Dr. Earle Cleveland Hass. Dr. Haas obtained a patent for this tampon in 1933. He combined the terms “tampon” and “vaginal packs” to create “Tampax”.8

A historic advertisement for Tampax tampons
A historic advertisement for Tampax tampons

 

Andrew Fisher, in his article for Havoc Journal, noted that “Kimberly-Clark, which produces Kotex ® did make and provide Cellucotton, an absorbent wadding made of wood pulp as bandages.” Apparently, WWI field nurses figured out that material made a reasonable disposable female napkin. He also stated that “production of cotton bandages and surgical dressings for the US military now took place alongside the tampon assembly lines” during WW2.1

Interested in more information on wound packing? You can watch a sample video demonstrating 4-different ways.

Interested in learning how to stop massive hemorrhage and be an immediate responder in an emergency? Try our online courses, or get started with a sample of the material in the preview course

Preview CourseNot sure? Try a preview TRAIN NOWOnline Tactical Casualty Care Classes

 

Footnotes

1 Havoc Journal“, Your Tactical Tampon is Useless for Life-Threatening Hemorrhage.” Andrew Fisher, January 15, 2019.

2Private Bloggins “Hemorrhage Control – What Aunt Flow Didn’t Know.” Chris, January 28, 2015.

3 Snopes.com Tampon Wound Dressing, Tampon used to stanch deadly wound saves Marine’s life? David Mikkelson, October, 20017

4 American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Gauze vs XSTAT in wound packing for hemorrhage control. Kragh MD, et. al, July 2015.

5 A study on the microbial quality of sealed products for feminine hygiene R. Briancesco et al. September, 2018

6 UK National Health Service, Heavy periods are common, but they can have a big effect on a woman’s everyday life. Author unknown, revised June 7, 2018.

7 Very Well Health, What Tampon Absorbency Ratings Mean. Tracee Cornforth, May 22, 2019.

8 The Atlantic, The Tampon: A History – The cultural, political, and technological roots of a fraught piece of cotton. Ashley Fetters, June 1, 2015.

 

Sign up for a free preview course

We never share your information.
Check to agree to our privacy policy

Tag:IFAK

  • Share:
Mike Shertz

Dr. Mike Shertz is the Owner and Lead Instructor at Crisis Medicine. Dr. Shertz spent over 30 years gaining the experience and insight to create and provide his comprehensive, science-informed, training to better prepare everyday citizens, law enforcement, EMS, and the military to manage casualties and wounded in high-risk environments. Using a combination of current and historical events, Dr. Shertz’s lectures include relevant, illustrative photos, as well as hands-on demonstrations to demystify the how, why, when to use each emergency medical procedure you need to become a Force Multiplier for Good.

Previous post

Hemostatic powders don't work
July 17, 2019

Next post

A sucking (and blowing) chest wound is the sound of not dying
August 3, 2019

You may also like

2 King CAT SQ
Mayhem in the Nutcracker Suite
12 December, 2021
A photo of a police officer's leg showing two, side-by-side CAT tourniquets properly applied to stop massive hemorrhage
Tourniquets: One may not be enough
10 September, 2021
A photo of the burly chest of an operator with an American flag and CAT tourniquet staged on the exterior of his gear, center line
Tourniquet environmental wear: is time of the essence?
11 August, 2021

    1 Comment

  1. Mryan2050
    July 18, 2019

    Thanks for clearing that up. It’s helpful. Tampons are blood sponges, not for junctional occlusion.

Leave A Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Featured Courses

Tactical Casualty Care – ONLINE

Tactical Casualty Care – ONLINE

$125.00
Advanced TC2 – ONLINE

Advanced TC2 – ONLINE

$350.00
Complete TC2 -ONLINE

Complete TC2 -ONLINE

$575.00

Sign up for a free preview course

We never share your information.
Check to agree to our privacy policy

Crisis Medicine

(503) 765-7615

logistics@crisis-medicine.com

DUNS: 093140133

CAGE: 8U3A3

Company

  • About Crisis Medicine
  • Disclosures
  • Training Partners & Contributors

Courses

  • Online Training
  • In-Person Training
  • Content Warning
  • FAQ’s

Fine Print

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Content Warning
  • Scope of Practice
  • Contact

Resources

  • N. Amer. Rescue
  • TacMed Solutions
  • Chinook Medical
  • Skedco
  • Wound Cube

©2022 Crisis Medicine, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap

Login with your site account

Lost your password?