Contact our office:

(503) 765-7615
logistics@crisis-medicine.com

Login
Crisis Medicine
  • Training
    • TCCC and TECC Concepts
    • Training for Law Enforcement
    • Training for Fire & EMS
    • Training for Private Citizens
    • Training for EDC
    • Training For Faith Communities
    • Training For Teachers
  • Courses
    • ONLINE TCCC & TECC Courses
    • In-Person Training Calendar
    • Preview Course
    • Course Overview By Skills
    • Student Reviews
  • Company
    • About Crisis Medicine
    • Agency Pricing
    • Contact
    • CM in the Media
    • Disclosures – None
    • Lessons Learned in Blood
    • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Learn
    • New
    • Quick Tips
    • MARCH
      • (S) Security & Awareness
      • (M) Massive Hemorrhage
      • (A) Airway
      • (R) Respiration
      • (C) Circulation
      • (H) Hypothermia Prevention
    • Everything Else
    • Equipment
    • Improvised
    • K9 TECC/TCCC
    • Air Travel Emergencies
    • Tactical CBRN
      • Tactical-CBRN Journal Watch
    • Planning Your IFAK
  • Store

(R) Respiration

A chest CT image of a pediatric patient, labeling how close the internal structures are to the chest wall

Pediatric Needle Decompression: Are We Using the Right Site and Needle Length?

  • Posted by Mike Shertz MD/18D
  • Categories (R) Respiration, MARCH

Researched and written by Mike Shertz, MD/18D, not AI

Pediatric-specific needle decompression recommendations remain an evolving discussion

🕖 Reading Time, 4 minutes

While adult guidelines for needle decompression for tension pneumothorax are well established, pediatric-specific recommendations remain an evolving discussion. Recent studies using CT and ultrasound have refined our understanding of pediatric chest wall thickness and the depth to vital structures

Understanding Pediatric Chest Wall Thickness

A retrospective study of 250 children under 13 years old undergoing chest CT measured chest wall thickness (CWT) at two key locations: the 2nd intercostal space (ICS), mid-clavicular line (MCL), and the 4th ICS, anterior axillary line (AAL).

2nd ICS MCL: CWT ranged from 1.6 to 2.5 cm, with a 95th percentile thickness of 3.8 cm.

4th ICS AAL: CWT ranged from 1.6 to 2.2 cm, with a 95th percentile thickness of 4.2 cm.

Based on these measurements, the authors concluded that a 1.5-inch (3.8 cm) 14 or 16 gauge IV catheter is an appropriate choice for pediatric needle decompression.1

However, some authors have also questioned the generalizability of CT chest data as most children don’t undergo CT imaging with its substantial radiation exposure. Additionally, for optimal CT imaging, children are placed with their arms up over their heads, which might reduce the thickness of their anterior chest wall because of the extension of the pectoralis major musculature in this position.

Diagram showing Broslow Tape Sizing relative to pediatric chest wall thickness
Mandt MJ, Hayes K, Severyn F, Adelgais K. Appropriate Needle Length for Emergent Pediatric Needle Thoracostomy Utilizing Computed Tomography. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct; 23(5):663-671. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1566422. Epub 2019 Feb 4. PMID: 30624127.

Ultrasound Data: A Radiation-Free Alternative

Ultrasound doesn’t pose a radiation exposure risk, nor require the “arm up positioning.” A convenience sample of 163 children, aged 0 to 16 years old, undergoing point of care ultrasound had the thickness of their chest walls measured at the 2nd intercostal space (ICS) mid clavicular line (MCL) and 4th ICS anterior axillae line (AAL)

In children weighing 3–5 kg, mean CWT was 1.11 cm (2nd ICS MCL) and 1.13 cm (4th ICS AAL).

In children over 36 kg, mean CWT was 2.36 cm (2nd ICS MCL) and 2.58 cm (4th ICS AAL).

This continues to support the recommendation for a 1.5 inch (3.8cm) 14 or 16 gauge IV catheter as an appropriate size for needle decompression in pediatrics.2

…Now that we’ve gotten some consensus on pediatric chest wall thickness, how close inside the child’s chest are important structures we don’t want to hit with a needle?

How Close Are Vital Structures?

A convenience sample of 139 children, aged 10 years old and under undergoing chest CT, had the thickness of their chest walls measured at the 2nd intercostal space (ICS) mid clavicular line (MCL) and 4th ICS anterior axillae line (AAL) and also the depth to vital structures (DVS) within the chest at those locations. Vital structures were defined as the pericardium, aorta, superior vena cava, inferior vena cava, thymus gland, and pulmonary vessels segmental or larger.

A photograph showing the lateral chest wall of a child with landmarks for needle decompression, highlighting the so-called triangle of safety
Photograph from: Quinn N, Palmer CS, Bernard S, Noonan M, Teague WJ. Thoracostomy in children with severe trauma: An overview of the paediatric experience in Victoria, Australia. Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Feb;32(1):117-126. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13392. Epub 2019 Sep 18. PMID: 31531952.

Depth to Vital Structures by Age Group with correct needle decompression technique:

Newborns (0 years old):
2nd ICS MCL: 4.9 cm,
4th ICS AAL (left): 3.15 cm

5-year-olds:
2nd ICS MCL: 6.8 cm
4th ICS AAL (left): 4.3 cm

10-year-olds:
2nd ICS MCL: 9.2 cm
4th ICS AAL (left): 6.11 cm

Importantly, when improper technique was simulated (i.e., directing the needle toward a vital structure), the DVS was significantly smaller across all age groups and locations.

Notably, the thymus and heart were directly adjacent to the chest wall at the 2nd ICS MCL in several children aged 0 and 5 years. As a result, the study authors recommended the 4th ICS AAL as the preferred site for pediatric needle decompression. However, they also found that the DVS at the 4th ICS AAL was generally shorter, particularly on the left side, requiring careful technique.3

…We’ve worked out chest wall thickness in pediatric patients, understand what sites to use to maximize not hitting vital structures, but how effective is needle decompression in children?

Real-World Outcomes: Does Needle Decompression Work in Kids?

A review of an Australian trauma registry identified 14 children (ages 1.2 to 15 years) who underwent thoracostomy for blunt trauma in the prehospital or emergency department (2016–2019). The most common indications were O2 saturation less than 92% or hypotension. Eight of 14 children underwent prehospital paramedic thoracostomy.4

10 children received prehospital needle decompression at the 2nd ICS MCL before chest tube placement.

6 of the ten failed to improve clinically after the procedure. The remaining four improved, but deteriorated with recurrent “tension physiology.”

8 of 14 underwent prehospital paramedic thoracostomy.

This data highlights the high failure rate of needle decompression in children at the traditional 2nd ICS MCL site, reinforcing the need for careful site selection and possibly a shift toward 4th ICS AAL placement.

Conclusion

This research provides clarification into pediatric chest wall thickness, depth to vital structures, and raises questions of the effectiveness of needle decompression in pediatrics.

A 1.5-inch (3.8 cm) catheter remains appropriate for most pediatric patients.

The 4th ICS AAL is likely the safer insertion site, especially in younger children, to avoid the heart and thymus.

Needle decompression at the 2nd ICS MCL had a high failure rate in a single center study.

As more evidence emerges, pediatric needle decompression protocols should continue to evolve to maximize safety and efficacy in the field.

References

1Mandt MJ, Hayes K, Severyn F, Adelgais K. Appropriate Needle Length for Emergent Pediatric Needle Thoracostomy Utilizing Computed Tomography. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;23(5):663-671. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1566422. Epub 2019 Feb 4. PMID: 30624127.

2Hossain R, Qadri U, Dembowski N, Garcia A, Chen L, Cicero MX, Riera A. Sound and Air: Ultrasonographic Measurements of Pediatric Chest Wall Thickness and Implications for Needle Decompression of Tension Pneumothorax. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1544-e1548. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002112. PMID: 32925707.

3Terboven T, Leonhard G, Wessel L, Viergutz T, Rudolph M, Schöler M, Weis M, Haubenreisser H. Chest wall thickness and depth to vital structures in paediatric patients – implications for prehospital needle decompression of tension pneumothorax. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 16;27(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0623-5. PMID: 30992028; PMCID: PMC6469218.

4Quinn N, Palmer CS, Bernard S, Noonan M, Teague WJ. Thoracostomy in children with severe trauma: An overview of the paediatric experience in Victoria, Australia. Emerg Med Australas. 2020 Feb;32(1):117-126. doi: 10

Related:

Chest Tube Placement: Is the Nipple a Reliable Landmark?

A painting by Suzanne Valadon, showing a woman sitting on a sofa with her arms crossed over her breasts
Mike Shertz MD/18D

Dr. Mike Shertz is the Owner and Lead Instructor at Crisis Medicine. Dr. Shertz is a dual-boarded Emergency Medicine and EMS physician, having spent over 30 years gaining the experience and insight to create and provide his comprehensive, science-informed, training to better prepare everyday citizens, law enforcement, EMS, and the military to manage casualties and wounded in high-risk environments. Drawing on his prior experience as an Army Special Forces medic (18D), two decades as an armed, embedded tactical medic on a regional SWAT team, and as a Fire Service and EMS medical director.

Using a combination of current and historical events, Dr. Shertz’s lectures include relevant, illustrative photos, as well as hands-on demonstrations to demystify the how, why, when to use each emergency medical procedure you need to become a Force Multiplier for Good.

Previous post

Breaking Down Airline Safety: Early Evacuation Insights from the Azerbaijan Airlines Crash

Next post

Smoke Hoods vs. Reality: Why Filtering Isn’t Enough in Life-Threatening Fires

You may also like

A chart comparing the differences between proposed mnemonics MARCH and MATCH
Tactical Resuscitation in 2025: Rethinking MARCH for the Blood Product Era
A screenshot showing 3 vertical orientation videos of Mike Shertz, MD-18D teaching some quick tips for TECC/TCCC training
Quick Tips
A woman places a tourniquet on a bleeding casualty's leg
How Misleading Data Could Change Tourniquet Protocols

Featured Courses

Tactical Casualty Care – ONLINE

Tactical Casualty Care – ONLINE

$150.00
Advanced TC2 – ONLINE

Advanced TC2 – ONLINE

$395.00
Complete TC2  -ONLINE

Complete TC2 -ONLINE

$595.00
Improvised TECC/TCCC

Improvised TECC/TCCC

$125.00
K9 Tactical Casualty Care for Humans  – ONLINE

K9 Tactical Casualty Care for Humans – ONLINE

$75.00
Tactical CBRN Casualty Care – ONLINE

Tactical CBRN Casualty Care – ONLINE

$225.00
First Receivers – No Notice MCI Events – ONLINE

First Receivers – No Notice MCI Events – ONLINE

$175.00
Air Travel Emergencies – ONLINE

Air Travel Emergencies – ONLINE

$175.00
Sign up for updates
Our privacy policy can be found at https://www.crisis-medicine.com/privacy-policy/
Loading
Learn MoreTactical Casualty Care course

Search

The short version of the Crisis Medicine logo showing a C and M with an arrow in between the two

DUNS: 093140133

CAGE: 8U3A3

Company

  • About Us
  • Disclosures – None
  • Contributors
  • Contact

Courses

  • Online
  • In-Person
  • Content Warning
  • FAQs

Fine Print

  • Terms
  • Privacy Policy
  • Scope of Practice
  • FAQs

Resources

  • N. Amer. Rescue
  • TacMed Solutions
  • Chinook Medical
  • Skedco
  • Wound Cube

©2025 Crisis Medicine, all rights reserved.

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Sitemap

Login with your site account

Lost your password?